[Java] The ArrowIPC Java library doesn't respect buffer offsets set in the flatbuffer metadata
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 94
- 派生
- 152
- 平均合并
- 3 天 16 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 11
描述
### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.
The `Buffer Alignment and Padding` [section](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/Columnar.html#buffer-alignment-and-padding) of the Arrow Columnar Format Specification allows padding to be either 8-bytes or 64-bytes with 64-bytes being preferred for SIMD performance reasons.
I have a custom implementation of the Arrow Columnar Format (serialization and deserialization only as we operate on an entirely different columnar format) where I pad all of my data buffers to 64-bytes when serializing. This works fine with the C++, Python and Rust libraries (and I think with the Go library as well) as they all use the `offset` value from the flatbuffer `Buffer` message when calculating where to read the next body buffer from...
The Java library however, seems to assume that the padding will always be 8-bytes and just pads the size of the `n-1`th buffer to 8-bytes when calculating the offset for the `n`th buffer. This assumption obviously breaks when the padding size is anything other than 8-bytes...
Would it be acceptable to bring the Java library in-line with the remaining implementations, i.e., have it respect the offset from the flatbuffer metadata?
### Component(s)
Java
贡献指南
调研方向
首先定位 Java 反序列化逻辑,该逻辑根据 flatbuffer Buffer 元数据计算连续的 body-buffer 位置。将其偏移量计算与 Arrow Columnar Format 规范进行比较,然后使用带有 64 字节填充的序列化输入验证 fix,并确认所有 Buffer 都从其元数据偏移量处读取。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- java
- 领域
- data-engineering
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100