apache / apache/airflow

The Contributor's Quick Start isn't quick enough and needs some TLC

Abierto
#39,653 5 comentarios 2 reacciones 1 asignado Reclamado por @RNHTTR Ver en GitHub
kind:documentation
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
46.9k
Forks
17.8k
Merge medio
2 d 10 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
483

Descripción

### What do you see as an issue?

The [Contributor's Quick Start](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/03_contributors_quick_start.rst) is super long and arguably confusing

There are also a handful of issues with the guide now. Here's an example, :

![image](https://github.com/apache/airflow/assets/25823361/05b0353a-f446-48f9-8050-ab79dab7f51e)

### Solving the problem

The guide references several different ways to run an Airflow dev environment:
* Containers with different flavors
* Docker
* Colima
* Docker compose
* Hatch, pyenv, pyenv-virtualenv, or virtualenvwrapper
* Postgres (not necessary for a lot of contributions, especially for someone new to contributing here)
* Breeze

I think we should align on the truly simplest way for users to make their first contribution and move everything else to separate guides.

### Anything else

_No response_

### Are you willing to submit PR?

- [X] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

### Code of Conduct

- [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.