Is it desired behavior to sleep, even after the last retry in the lock function?
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Ruby
- Sterne
- 213
- Forks
- 24
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
If a lock was _not_ obtained in the lock function, is it desired behavior to sleep (in line 80), even after the last retry?
I think that the last retry's sleep will be a waste of time, if the lock was not obtained.
https://github.com/antirez/redlock-rb/blob/97be08b307eaad7f9b23db41e8def691ea41a342/redlock.rb#L55-L57
https://github.com/antirez/redlock-rb/blob/97be08b307eaad7f9b23db41e8def691ea41a342/redlock.rb#L79-L81
If my argument holds, how about:
```
for i in 0..(retry_count-1)
# The major part of the lock function goes here.
# Don't sleep if it's the last retry.
if (i != retry_count-1)
# Wait a random part of retry_delay, before retrying.
sleep(rand(@retry_delay).to_f/1000)
end
end
```
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.