setup-token intermittently issues CLI OAuth tokens missing user:sessions:claude_code, blocking Routines/RemoteTrigger — account-wide, mechanism-independent

`claude setup-token` mints a long-lived CLI OAuth token. On my account, this
has repeatedly produced tokens missing the `user:sessions:claude_code`
scope, which `/v1/code/*` (Routines management, the `RemoteTrigger` tool)
requires. The resulting token authenticates fine for plain inference but
401s `oauth_scope_insufficient` on any routines-related call.

Evidence, in order of investigation:

1. Listed the account's live OAuth tokens via the tokens API: 228 live
tokens, only 54 ever carried `user:sessions:claude_code`. The six most
recent (one rotation's worth) carried only `user:ccr_inference
user:file_upload` or bare `user:inference`.
2. Ruled out account/org-level causes: the Routines admin toggle is on,
connector permissions don't apply to the CLI, plan tier isn't gating it.
3. Re-minted multiple times over several days — most attempts still produce
a scope-deficient token. One mint via a private/incognito browser window
appeared to pass our own verification, but that verification itself had
a bug (see #4) — so incognito is not a confirmed fix.
4. Reproduced completely independent of any of our own tooling: a plain
`claude` session with zero custom scripting or env injection, freshly
opened outside our usual setup, showed `authMethod: "oauth_token"` and
got the identical 401 `oauth_scope_insufficient` calling RemoteTrigger.
5. Most notable finding: the same token, used two different ways seconds
apart, gave different results. A one-shot `claude -p` call with the
token passed a strict check (confirmed via the actual JSON result
object, `is_error: false`). Seconds later, a separate live interactive
session using the same freshly-minted token (fetched via the identical
code path) got 401 `oauth_scope_insufficient` calling the same tool.
Same credential, same account, different outcome depending on call
shape (one-shot vs. session-based).

Ask: is `setup-token`'s granted scope set supposed to be deterministic?
What determines it — and could there be a propagation delay or
inconsistency between how a freshly-granted scope is evaluated for a
one-shot API call versus a persistent session? A pointer to what's going
on, or a workaround, would be appreciated — this blocks all CLI-driven
Routines management on the account.

Start by reproducing `claude setup-token`, then compare one-shot `claude -p` and interactive `claude` use of the same token against RemoteTrigger. Trace the token issuance path and the `/v1/code/*` scope check, using the reported `oauth_scope_insufficient` result as the failure signal. Done means the granted scope and its evaluation are consistent for both call shapes.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.