[Bug] Cybersecurity classifier blocking defensive malware analysis tooling mid-conversation

**Bug Description**
A conversation building defensive Android malware triage tooling (static APK analysis, permission auditing, LLM-assisted classification via Ollama Cloud, passive OSINT for IOC reporting to law enforcement) was blocked by the cybersecurity safety classifier partway through. The conversation had been proceeding normally for ~15 turns with no prior flags, including file creation of manifest audit code, router logic, and LLM client wrapper — all deterministic/defensive in nature.

Context:

Use case: triaging a real fake-KYC banking-dropper APK received via a compromised family member's WhatsApp, for submission to Maharashtra Cyber / CERT-In.
Explicit scope boundary was documented in the project README (passive analysis and OSINT only; active exploitation of attacker infrastructure explicitly excluded).
No malware was requested to be written; only detection/analysis tooling.
The block occurred on a message continuing prior technical work, not on a new/escalated request.

What I'd like investigated:

Whether this pattern (multi-turn defensive tooling requests, code generation for static analysis) is a known trigger for over-blocking.
Whether Cyber Verification Program enrollment status is correctly checked/applied mid-conversation, or only at session start.

Attachments available on request: conversation transcript, repo scaffold created prior to the block.

**Environment Info**
- Platform: darwin
- Terminal: iTerm.app
- Version: 2.1.212
- Feedback ID: 2fb7f73d-2023-4568-bb31-44c16e6f03ec

**Errors**
```json
[]
```

Start with the supplied conversation transcript and repo scaffold, especially the README scope boundary and the manifest audit, router, and LLM client wrapper mentioned in the report. Reproduce or review the block if the materials are provided, then determine whether defensive multi-turn requests trigger over-blocking and whether Cyber Verification Program enrollment is applied mid-conversation; done means both questions have a documented finding.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.