anthropics / anthropics/claude-code

[Bug] Anthropic API Error: Account validation state mismatch for forensics access

Open
#87,803 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
area:model bug platform:windows stale
Dominant language
Python
Stars
145k
Forks
23.1k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

**Bug Description**
this happened again my account has been approved and lvaidated for forensics work - Request ID: req_011CeB59tNo4qzHzbvoD4woB
Details: `[cyber]`

**Environment Info**
- Platform: win32
- Terminal: null
- Version: 2.1.235
- Feedback ID: 810629aa-c737-47ff-b2b8-2345bdf887e7

**Errors**
```json
[]
```
Opus 5 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate coding, cybersecurity,
and biology tasks. Switched to Opus 4.8. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16049681

Details: `[cyber]`
⎿ Tip: You can configure model switch behavior in /config

● API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity
work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeAv1HG9iaHvdag4ghzna

✻ Baked for 2m 28s

> /config
⎿ Settings dialog dismissed

> /artifact-design

● API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity
work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeAwirfLjH6T2uPBvECP2

✻ Cogitated for 3s

> continue

● API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity
work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeAwmCm8MeWgeLWxHy3PF

✻ Baked for 2s

> /config
⎿ Config dialog dismissed

> /exit
⎿ Goodbye!

● Unknown command: /a. Did you mean /cd?

> perform the whole flow, investiagiotn we can use envy forensics as well as the backend tool we can wire in what we need as a third party tool, decompiler etc.....
● Opus 5's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate coding, cybersecurity, and biology
tasks. Switched to Opus 4.8. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/16049681

Details: `[cyber]`
⎿ Tip: You can configure model switch behavior in /config

● API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity
work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeB2fbiB1jxTTjnQnkLPe

✻ Worked for 7s

> /?
● API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity
work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more:
https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeB59tNo4qzHzbvoD4woB
****

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

No repository file, test, or entry point is identified. Start by examining the reported request IDs, feedback ID, Windows environment, and version 2.1.235, then reproduce the approved-forensics account flow; done means the account validation state is honored without repeated cybersecurity safeguard errors.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
authentication, security
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.