anthropics / anthropics/claude-agent-sdk-python

ResultMessage.usage is missing thinking token breakdown

Offen
#540 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
8.1k
Forks
1.3k
Ø Merge
2 T. 31 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
1

Beschreibung

**The Problem**

Right now ResultMessage.usage lumps thinking tokens into output_tokens, but thinking tokens are actually billed differently from regular output. This makes it impossible to accurately
track costs.

When I set MAX_THINKING_TOKENS = 8000, I'm effectively authorizing up to $0.12 in thinking tokens per turn ($15/M), but I can't tell from the usage data how much of that was actually
used vs regular output.

**What I'm Seeing**

# Currently receiving:
{
"input_tokens": 9,
"output_tokens": 112, # thinking tokens mixed in here
"cache_read_input_tokens": 13916,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 11227
}

**What I'd Expect**

Since the Anthropic API returns thinking counts separately, would be great to see them broken out:

{
"input_tokens": 9,
"output_tokens": 42,
"thinking_tokens": 70, # or separate thinking_input/thinking_output if available
"cache_read_input_tokens": 13916,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 11227
}

**Why This Matters**

- Thinking tokens can easily be 50%+ of a run's cost
- When debugging expensive runs, it's hard to know if the model is thinking too much or outputting too much
- Different pricing should be visible in the usage stats

The raw API already exposes this, it's just a matter of surfacing it through the SDK's usage object.

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.