bug(MatChipInput): MatChipInput does not set `mat-form-field-disabled` on MatFormField wrapper when being disabled

### Is this a regression?

- [ ] Yes, this behavior used to work in the previous version

### The previous version in which this bug was not present was

_No response_

### Description

When a MatChipInput is disabled, it does not set `mat-form-field-disabled` CSS class on its MatFormField wrapper like it does for MatInput.

### Reproduction

StackBlitz link: https://stackblitz.com/edit/xcgzeewq?file=src%2Fexample%2Fchips-input-example.html
Steps to reproduce:
1. There are one disabled MatChipInput and one disabled MatInput in the example
2. The form field wrapper of the MatInput has `mat-form-field-disabled` CSS class, while the form field wrapper of the MatChipInput does not

### Expected Behavior

Both of the form field should set `mat-form-field-disabled` CSS class as the input is disabled.

### Actual Behavior

The form field wrapper of the MatInput has `mat-form-field-disabled` CSS class, while the form field wrapper of the MatChipInput does not

### Environment

- Angular:
- CDK/Material:
- Browser(s): Chrome
- Operating System (e.g. Windows, macOS, Ubuntu): macOS

Commencez par la reproduction dans src/example/chips-input-example.html du StackBlitz lié et comparez le MatChipInput désactivé avec le MatInput désactivé. Vérifiez le comportement du wrapper MatFormField dans les deux cas et confirmez que la modification terminée fait recevoir mat-form-field-disabled au wrapper pour un chip input désactivé.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.