andywer / andywer/postcss-debug

How to actually use this

Aberta
#19 1 comentário 1 reação 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
Linguagem predominante
JavaScript
Estrelas
94
Forks
7
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Descrição

The documentation is quite lacking. It basically doesn't explain how to actually use the thing. You have to follow the link to the Webdebugger README (under **Contributing**) to learn that it rewrites `index.html` with the debugging data embedded.

`debug.inspect()` doesn't appear to do much (it doesn't start a web server or anything), but behind the scenes it "automagically" updates the Webdebugger's static page. The Webdebugger is supposed to be "loosely coupled" and "stand-alone" but I'm not sure how you'd use one without the other.

To debug multiple files you have to call `debug` multiple times and `debug.inspect` only once, which is _reasonable_, but not documented.

Here's what I would suggest:
1. Consider the "Webdebugger" a vital part of this tool and explain how to access it on the README. It's best to do this with [live-server](https://www.npmjs.com/package/live-server) i.e. `live-server --open node_modules/postcss-debug/webdebugger/build/`
2. Instead of rewriting `index.html`, have `index.html` include the debugging data via a script tag. Let the static page truly be a static page and avoid having to patch it with string replacement.
3. Rename `debug.inspect` to something like `debug.dump` or `debug.write`, and provide a callback with the path to the static page, so the user can log something when it's done, maybe launch a server, and to improve the code's ability to self-document.
4. Document the methods of the API explicitly, not just through code examples

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Avaliação

Esta issue ainda não foi avaliada.

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.