amethyst / amethyst/legion

Terminology: Why World?

未关闭
#123 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
Rust
星标
1.7k
派生
140
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

Disclaimer: I am aware that this library is tailored toward games. Moreover, this issue could result in some bikeshedding, so sorry in advance!

Coming from [set theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory), one thing that feels particularly strange to me is the terminology regarding "world" and "universe". On the one hand, universe is something that is inspired by the universal set, i.e., the set of all sets. On the other hand, world is something very physical (such as a planet), without any correspondence in the set theory. Nevertheless, it is possible to do something very unphysical to worlds, namely merging, i.e., constructing a union of two entity sets. Playing some WoW, it also could be an instance, but then there is no corresponding notion of class (level), which is also not a great choice.

Is there a specific reason why world was chosen over entity set?

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。