`support/arbitrary`: We should use `rand` in tests, not `arbitrary`.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 225
- 派生
- 70
- 平均合并
- 16 小时 54 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 8
描述
*On 2022-10-28 @recmo wrote in [`49f6271`](https://github.com/recmo/uint/commit/49f6271d9967c55a71f588ed267387b57a285d43) “Merge pull request #195 from recmo/pow2”:*
We should use `rand` in tests, not `arbitrary`.
```rust
// TODO: Instead of uniform random sampling, we should use a distribution that
// exercises different scales more. Something like sum(±2ⁱ for random i). The
// reduction step can then remove terms or make them smaller.
// TODO: We should use `rand` in tests, not `arbitrary`.
impl<'a, const BITS: usize, const LIMBS: usize> Arbitrary<'a> for Uint {
fn arbitrary(u: &mut Unstructured<'a>) -> Result {
let mut limbs = [0; LIMBS];
if let Some((last, rest)) = limbs.split_last_mut() {
```
*From [`src/support/arbitrary.rs:11`](https://github.com/recmo/uint/blob/49f6271d9967c55a71f588ed267387b57a285d43/src/support/arbitrary.rs#L11)*
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。