allenai / allenai/WildDet3D

Verify evals on Papers with Code

Aberta
#29 0 comentários 0 reações 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub
Linguagem predominante
Python
Estrelas
622
Forks
45
Métricas de merge de PRs
Nenhum PR com merge em 30d

Descrição

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the [paper](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2604.08626) and [1 verified paper-native evaluation](https://paperswithcode.co/paper/2604.08626#results) available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the [3D object detection](https://paperswithcode.co/tasks/3d-object-detection) task page.

The WildDet3D (text prompt) result currently ranks first on [Omni3D](https://paperswithcode.co/benchmark/omni3d?task=3d-object-detection&eval=16129).

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):

[![Papers with Code: SOTA on Omni3D](https://paperswithcode.co/api/v1/papers/2604.08626/leaderboard-badge.svg?eval=16129&live=1)](https://paperswithcode.co/benchmark/omni3d?task=3d-object-detection&eval=16129)

Kind regards,

Niels

Guia de contribuição

Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório

Direção de pesquisa

Open the linked Papers with Code paper, results, task, and benchmark pages. Compare the WildDet3D (text prompt) result with the paper or official release artifacts, checking the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata; done when the listing is verified or the needed corrections are reported.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Avaliação

Domínio
documentation
Tipo de issue
Documentação
Dificuldade
2/5
Tempo estimado
1-3 horas
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Clareza
Razoavelmente clara
Facilidade para iniciantes
48/100

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.