alexmojaki / alexmojaki/executing
parent pointers in AST nodes hurt deepcopy performance
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 401
- Forks
- 38
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Obligatory "I'm a huge fan of your work".
Background: I maintain a library called [ipyflow](https://github.com/ipyflow/ipyflow), which uses another library I maintain called [pyccolo](https://github.com/smacke/pyccolo). I noticed that on ipython >= 8.0, which uses `executing` for better stack traces, ipyflow would have really bad performance regressions the first time after a cell throws some exception.
Eventually I traced it to pyccolo's use of `copy.deepcopy` in a few places -- performance was bad because the parent pointers that `executing` added to AST nodes were causing deepcopy to do a lot of extra unnecessary work.
I ended up working around it on the pyccolo side, but I figured you may be interested in this for other libraries that may want to use `executing` and get surprised when `deepcopy` has bad perf. The way we maintain deepcopy-ability in pyccolo is to maintain a mapping from id(node) to parent for parent pointers, which avoids setting an attribute on the AST node directly.
Thanks for this great library!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.