akveo / akveo/ngx-admin

Would you take a pull-request security scan workflow?

未关闭
#6,070 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
TypeScript
星标
25.7k
派生
7.9k
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

Would a pull-request security scan be useful here, or is this already covered?

One workflow. On each pull request it scans the checked-out repository for
hardcoded credentials, injection, SSRF and unsafe deserialisation, and writes
findings to the Security tab. Report-only — findings never fail the build.

Two files under `.github/`, a pinned `@profullstack/threatcrush@0.11.1` whose tarball is hashed before
install, and `pull_request` rather than `pull_request_target`.

A pull request is open alongside this with the diff, if reading it is easier
than discussing it.

Disclosure: I maintain [ThreatCrush](https://github.com/profullstack/threatcrush);
MIT and free. Written with AI assistance. Closing this is a fine answer and I
will not ask again.

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

调研方向

Start by reading the open pull request diff and the two files under `.github/`. Verify that the workflow uses `pull_request`, pins the ThreatCrush tarball with its hash, reports findings to the Security tab, and does not fail builds.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
github-actions
领域
ci-cd, security
Issue 类型
功能
难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。