SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) supports

"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

Can you add support for?
- SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120

- SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677 since 2015-11-02
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8600 since 2019-06-21: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/suJMmeMhuAOmGn_PJYgX5Vm8lNA

- SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS):
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-scram-sha-512

- SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS):
-- https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-scram-sha3-512

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:
- RFC5056: On the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure Channels: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5056
- RFC5929: Channel Bindings for TLS: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5929
- Channel-Binding Types: https://www.iana.org/assignments/channel-binding-types/channel-binding-types.xhtml
- RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9266

LDAP:
- RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:
- RFC7804: Salted Challenge Response HTTP Authentication Mechanism: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7804

2FA:
- Extensions to Salted Challenge Response (SCRAM) for 2 factor authentication: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-scram-2fa

IANA:
- Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms: https://www.iana.org/assignments/sasl-mechanisms/sasl-mechanisms.xhtml

Linked to:
- https://github.com/scram-xmpp/info/issues/1