agentscope-ai / agentscope-ai/AgentTeams

Public roadmap and "good first contribution" guidance — how can community contributors plug in?

Offen
#735 7 Kommentare 1 Reaktion 1 zugewiesene Person Beansprucht von @shiyiyue1102 Auf GitHub ansehen
area:roadmap-ecosystem
Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
5.6k
Forks
692
Ø Merge
6 T. 6 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
23

Beschreibung

Hi maintainers,

Loving the v1.1.0 direction (K8s-native control plane, Hermes runtime, the
hiclaw CLI replacing shell scripts). I'm building a small company on top of
HiClaw + AgentScope and would like to contribute back, but I'm unclear on:
## Roadmap visibility
1. Is there a public roadmap beyond the changelog? I see the recent blog
posts (1.1.0 release, K8s-native architecture, declarative resource
management) but no consolidated "next 6 months" view.
2. What are the current focus areas for v1.2 / v1.3? Helps me avoid
duplicating work the team is already planning.
3. Are there any in-flight RFCs or design docs that aren't yet code?

## Contribution surface
4. Is there a "good first issue" or "help wanted" label triage?
5. Are there areas where community PRs are explicitly welcome vs.
6. maintainer-only (e.g., new Worker runtimes, new Manager skills,
controller internals, Helm chart improvements, docs)?
6. What's the preferred shape for a new community-contributed Worker skill
under `manager/agent/worker-skills/`?

## Specific contribution candidates I'm considering
(Happy to drop any of these if they conflict with planned work)
- [ ]
- [ ] **Hermes ↔ Hindsight memory wiring**: HiClaw's Hermes image
pins v2026.4.16 which includes Hindsight as a native memory
provider, but the bridge in `hermes/src/hermes_worker/bridge.py`
doesn't enable it by default. I'd propose a `HICLAW_HERMES_MEMORY`
env var that the bridge writes into `~/.hermes/config.yaml` as
`memory.provider: hindsight`. ~50 LOC change.

- [ ] **CoPaw (now QwenPaw) ↔ Hindsight bridge**: AgentScope's ReMe is
the current memory primitive. A `reme-hindsight-backend` plugin
would unify all three runtimes under Hindsight. Could live in
`copaw/` or upstream in QwenPaw — your call on placement.

- [ ] **`accessEntries` documentation**: Could clarify in the CRD
reference that `accessEntries` is a no-op in single-tenant
local mode without a credential-provider sidecar (caught me by
surprise reading types.go:34-35).

- [ ] **CRD reference docs**: A generated CRD schema reference (from
`api/v1beta1/types.go`) would help operators. Happy to wire up
`kubebuilder:docs` or similar.

- [ ] **Skill format spec**: A short doc formalizing the SKILL.md
frontmatter conventions used in `manager/agent/skills/` and
`manager/agent/worker-skills/`. New contributors (myself
included) currently learn by reading existing skills.

## Process questions
7. Is there a Discord / Slack where contributors hang out beyond GitHub?
(I see the Discord link in the README but want to confirm it's
active for dev discussion.)
8. Do you accept docs-only PRs to fix outdated info (e.g., the README
still mentions QwenPaw alongside CoPaw — happy to send a PR that
reflects the rebrand consistently)?
9. Is there a contributor agreement (CLA / DCO) I should sign?

Thanks for the work — happy to start small and ramp up.

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.