ag-ui-protocol / ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui

Clarification: should messages in RunAgentInput contain full history or can it be a delta?

Offen
#2,230 1 Kommentar 1 Reaktion 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
15.9k
Forks
1.4k
Ø Merge
1 T. 17 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
163

Beschreibung

We're building an AG-UI backend where the **server owns message history** (stored in a database). On each request, the server loads the full conversation from DB and appends any new messages from the client.

Our frontend sends only the **delta** in `RunAgentInput.messages` — e.g. just the new user message, or just `ToolMessage`s (results from frontend-executed tool calls).

**Question:** Does the AG-UI protocol require `messages` to always contain the complete conversation history? Or is a delta-only approach valid when the server manages persistence?

We ask because some AG-UI adapter implementations (e.g. PydanticAI) merge `messages` with a server-side history parameter, which implies delta is supported. But other behavior (like requiring a `ToolMessage` to have a preceding `AssistantMessage` with matching `tool_calls` in the same list) only works with full history.

Related: #1386, #1160

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.