Tables in pdf cannot be processed properly

The content before and after the table in the pdf file cannot be processed normally, and the content of the table and the content of the article will be confused.


Methods
The recommendations are graded based on a modified Delphi methodology with categorization as previously described (Table 1) [3]. The methods for this document build upon a 2001 publication Table 1 Grading system Grading recommendations

A. Supported by at least 2 level I investigations B. Supported by 1 level I investigation C. Supported by level II investigations only D. Supported by at least 1 level III investigation E. Supported by level IV or V evidence Grading of evidence I. Large, randomized trials with clearcut results; low risk of false-positive (alpha) error or false-negative (beta) error II. Small, randomized trials with uncertain results; moderate-tohigh risk of false-positive (alpha) and/or false-negative (beta) error III. Non-randomized, contemporaneous controls IV. Non-randomized, historical controls and expert opinion V. Case series, uncontrolled studies, and expert opinion sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum, and use the same method of recommendation grading [4]. The grading system was applied to the question from which each recommendation is created. The supplement submission includes background material, questions, and expanded rationale. This executive summary is targeted to be concise and user friendly for the bedside clinician.

There are many other contents that cannot be recognized normally

The following is the processed content

Start by reproducing the table-containing PDF behavior described in issue #18 and inspect the PDF processing path that produces the attached examples. Compare the extracted table with the text before and after it; done means table content and surrounding article content remain correctly separated and ordered.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.