Guidance for program/workshop chairs regarding paper metadata?

I am a workshop organizer and find that the START final submission form needs a nontrivial amount of customization.

Given that author name cleanliness has been an issue, I am including

- an editable Authors field (I don't know if this is present in the final submission form by default)
- below that, a mandatory checkbox: "I have checked that the order/spelling/capitalization of author names is correct and matches the PDF."

Should the Anthology provide official guidelines as to what should be on the final submission form, in order to improve quality of the metadata to be ingested? Maybe there are other recommendations that would make sense as well.

Start by reviewing the START final submission form and the metadata fields described in the issue, especially the editable Authors field and author-name confirmation checkbox. Compare these with the Anthology's current submission and ingestion guidance; done means producing agreed official recommendations for workshop and program chairs, including any additional metadata checks.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。