abseil / abseil/abseil-cpp

[Bug]: StackTrace.NestedSignal in absl_stacktrace_test fails on ppc64le since 20250184.0

Đang mở
#1,925 1 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub
Ngôn ngữ chính
C++
Star
18.1k
Fork
3.2k
Merge trung bình
20 giờ 36 phút
Pull request đã merge (30 ngày)
1

Mô tả

### Describe the issue

Since the [20250814.0 release](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/releases/tag/20250814.0), the [`abseil-cpp` package in Fedora](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/) fails to build on `ppc64le` due to a failure in `StackTrace.NestedSignal` in `absl_stacktrace_test` on the `ppc64le` architecture. This does not happen on the `x86_64`, `i686`, `aarch64`, or `s390x` architectures.

```
Start 62: absl_stacktrace_test
61/218 Test #62: absl_stacktrace_test ...............................Subprocess aborted***Exception: 1.16 sec
Running main() from gmock_main.cc
[==========] Running 5 tests from 1 test suite.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 5 tests from StackTrace
[ RUN ] StackTrace.FixupNoFixupEquivalence
/builddir/build/BUILD/abseil-cpp-20250814.0-build/abseil-cpp-20250814.0/absl/debugging/stacktrace_test.cc:107: Skipped
Frame pointers are required, but not guaranteed in OSS

[ SKIPPED ] StackTrace.FixupNoFixupEquivalence (0 ms)
[ RUN ] StackTrace.FixupLowStackUsage
[ OK ] StackTrace.FixupLowStackUsage (2 ms)
[ RUN ] StackTrace.CustomUnwinderPerformsFixup
[ OK ] StackTrace.CustomUnwinderPerformsFixup (0 ms)
[ RUN ] StackTrace.CanonicalFrameAddresses
[ OK ] StackTrace.CanonicalFrameAddresses (0 ms)
[ RUN ] StackTrace.NestedSignal
absl_stacktrace_test: /builddir/build/BUILD/abseil-cpp-20250814.0-build/abseil-cpp-20250814.0/absl/debugging/internal/stacktrace_powerpc-inl.inc:117: void** NextStackFrame(void**, const void*) [with bool STRICT_UNWINDING = true; bool IS_WITH_CONTEXT = true]: Assertion `false && "VDSO is present, but doesn't have expected symbol"' failed.
```

### Steps to reproduce the problem

I tried the following on emulated `ppc64le` hardware – anyone can do this by running a `ppc64le` version of Fedora 41 via `qemu-user-system`; I used a [`mock` chroot](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock) with emulation via `qemu-user-static`.

```
$ git clone https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp.git
$ cd abseil-cpp
$ git checkout 20250814.0
$ cmake -S. -Bbuild -DABSL_BUILD_TESTING:BOOL=ON -DABSL_USE_EXTERNAL_GOOGLETEST:BOOL=ON -DABSL_FIND_GOOGLETEST:BOOL=ON
$ cmake --build build -j16 --verbose
$ ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j16 --exclude-regex 'absl_(symbolize|mutex|btree)_test'
```

I excluded `absl_symbolize_test` because it failed in emulation only, which I didn’t consider significant; I excluded `absl_mutex_test` and `absl_btree_test` because they were painfully slow while working in emulation on an `aarch64` laptop.

I was *not* able to reproduce this issue in emulation.

I repeated the above with Fedora’s C++ compiler flags,

```
export CXXFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection'
```

and got the same result.

### What version of Abseil are you using?

20250184.0

### What operating system and version are you using?

Fedora Rawhide (44)

### What compiler and version are you using?

```
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/15/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: ppc64le-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,ada,go,m2,lto --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --enable-targets=powerpcle-linux --disable-multilib --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id --with-gcc-major-version-only --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --with-libstdcxx-zoneinfo=/usr/share/zoneinfo --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array --with-isl=/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-15.2.1-build/gcc-15.2.1-20250808/obj-ppc64le-redhat-linux/isl-install --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-offload-defaulted --without-cuda-driver --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128 --with-long-double-format=ieee --with-cpu-32=power8 --with-tune-32=power8 --with-cpu-64=power8 --with-tune-64=power8 --build=ppc64le-redhat-linux --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-link-serialization=1
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 15.2.1 20250808 (Red Hat 15.2.1-1) (GCC)
```

### What build system are you using?

```
cmake version 3.31.6

CMake suite maintained and supported by Kitware (kitware.com/cmake).
```

### Additional context

While I don’t have *interactive* access to real `pp64le` hardware, I’m happy to test candidate patches or do experiments to get additional information by performing non-interactive `abseil-cpp` package “scratch” builds on Fedora infrastructure.

This reminds me of https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/1804, which also appears only on `ppc64le` and is also difficult to reproduce in emulation.

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Mở hướng dẫn đóng góp

Đánh giá

Issue này chưa được đánh giá.

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.