aboutcode-org / aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit

License scan reports conjunctive rather than disjunctive license expression for slint v1.0.0

Abierto
#3,316 1 comentario 1 reacción 1 asignado Reclamado por @AyanSinhaMahapatra Ver en GitHub
bug
Lenguaje dominante
Python
Estrellas
2.6k
Forks
791
Merge medio
1 d 12 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
5

Descripción

A recent scan using SCIO v32.1.0 of the code available at https://github.com/slint-ui/slint/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.0.tar.gz reported a declared license expression of gpl-3.0 AND proprietary-license even though the notices state that there is actually a choice of licenses.

from README.md:

## License

Slint is available under either a [proprietary license](LICENSES/LicenseRef-Slint-commercial.md)
or [GNU GPLv3](LICENSES/GPL-3.0-only.txt)

The proprietary license is provided free-of-charge in exchange for (1) consent that we can showcase the application, (2) attribution of Slint in the application and (3) feedback to improve Slint.
Check out our [ambassador program](https://slint-ui.com/ambassador-program.html).

from LICENSE.md

# Slint License

Slint is available under either a [proprietary license](LICENSES/LicenseRef-Slint-commercial.md)
or [GNU GPLv3](LICENSES/GPL-3.0-only.txt).

Third party licenses listed in the `LICENSES` folder also apply to parts of the product.

The either/or construction clearly indicates a disjunctive choice of licenses rather than a conjunctive combination of licenses. The correct license expression would be:
gpl-3.0 OR proprietary-license

Scan results attached

[slint-1.0.0.tar.gz_scan.json.zip](https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/files/11223290/slint-1.0.0.tar.gz_scan.json.zip)

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.