Implementation doubt

**** | DUMB QUESTION WARNING | ****

I’ve got a dumb question, but I’m curious: why doesn’t this library use LlamaCpp’s standard chat templates (`llama_chat_apply_template`) and instead go for a completely new implementation? I see it adds a lot of extra features, like function calling, but aren’t most (or at least a lot) of the chat formats already covered in LlamaCpp? Same goes for grammar and speculative stuff, maybe?