What're the tagging rules for "transitive" separate sidewalks?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619241252#map=19/53.805620/-1.532968&layers=N

1) The road has `cycleway:left = separate` (err this one doesn't, but the other side does -- pretend this is true)
2) The cycleway has `sidewalk:left = separate`

So by transitivity, the road has a separate sidewalk on the left side.

Should the road have `sidewalk:left = separate` or `sidewalk:left = no`? Is it "double tagging" to mark this on both the road and cycleway? It's more like repeating a pointer to something else, rather than mapping it twice.

El issue trata sobre las reglas de etiquetado de OpenStreetMap para aceras y cycleways. Empieza leyendo la wiki de OSM sobre el etiquetado de aceras y cycleways y, después, examina el código del repositorio speedwalk que procesa estas etiquetas. Busca la lógica existente que gestiona el etiquetado 'transitive' para entender el comportamiento actual. Determina si la carretera debería heredar sidewalk:left=separate del cycleway o si debería marcarse como no.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.