scatter simulation/estimation recommendations for downsampling etc
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- computer-vision
Research direction
Read the referenced sections of src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterEstimation.cxx and ScatterSimulation.cxx, then inspect the voxel-sizing function near ScatterSimulation.cxx:920 and its call sites. Determine the intended defaults for downsampled detector resolution in scatter estimation and simulation, and define completion by applying or documenting consistent defaults with validation for both paths.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
It looks like our default settings could lead to suboptimal scatter estimates (definitely simulations). I haven't checked the documentation yet.
A potential issue is that, as we use ray-tracing for computing the line integrals (through both emission and attenuation), the image resolution needs to match (downsampled) detector size. This seems currently not implemented by default. Some pointers
scatter estimation
https://github.com/UCL/STIR/blob/8ced2d73933420457e0bc76074964b7d4ff00f0c/src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterEstimation.cxx#L587-L588
https://github.com/UCL/STIR/blob/8ced2d73933420457e0bc76074964b7d4ff00f0c/src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterEstimation.cxx#L558-L563
scatter simulation
https://github.com/UCL/STIR/blob/8ced2d73933420457e0bc76074964b7d4ff00f0c/src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterSimulation.cxx#L320-L326
https://github.com/UCL/STIR/blob/8ced2d73933420457e0bc76074964b7d4ff00f0c/src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterSimulation.cxx#L328-L333
We do have this function which tries to set voxel sizes appropriately, but it seems it isn't called anywhere
https://github.com/UCL/STIR/blob/8ced2d73933420457e0bc76074964b7d4ff00f0c/src/scatter_buildblock/ScatterSimulation.cxx#L920
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 160
- Forks
- 113
- Avg merge
- 12d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from UCL/STIR
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 68/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Sensor initialization takes very long when `--initial-sim-time` is set to current UNIX timestamp Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
gazebosim/gz-sensors#662 · 1 comment ·
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
comp-datalake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#121222 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
LadybirdBrowser/ladybird#12123 ·