`else` block in `try` statement swallows exceptions
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- javascript, python
- Domain
- compilers
Research direction
No source file or test is named. Start by tracing how the compiler translates the provided Python try/except/else example, then verify that an exception raised in the else block reaches the outer context instead of being swallowed; issue #99 may provide related history.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Exceptions raised in the else block should bubble out, but instead they currently get suppressed.
This:
try:
pass
except:
pass
else:
raise Exception('something wrong happened in the `else`')
compiles to:
try {
// pass;
try {
var __except0__ = Exception ('something wrong happened in the `else`');
__except0__.__cause__ = null;
throw __except0__;
}
catch (__except0__) {
}
}
catch (__except0__) {
// pass;
}
I suggest: set a temporary boolean variable to true before the try, then flip it to false as the very first statement inside the catch, and then have an if statement on that boolean as the very first statement after the catch block (it might be better to just always generate that if inside a finally in the JavaScript even if there is no finally in the Python, because it has to execute before any finally if it does exist).
(My reasoning for flipping the boolean as the first statement in the catch instead of the last statement in the try is that if for some reason ever a JavaScript implementation existed that raised an exception while trying to set that internal implementation book-keeping variable, I think it better that our generated code explode that up a level, instead of it being caught by the local except block, because logically that is an error within the try statement itself, not the block of code inside it.)
P.S. In similar situations in the future, would you prefer I reopened #99 instead of creating this new issue?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 218
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt#913 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt#911 · 2 comments ·
-
IS: bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt#908 ·
-
SUB: documentation
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 62/100
TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt#656 · 7 comments ·
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 76/100
TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt#914 ·
All issues in TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt
Similar issues
-
area/auth bug comp/agent P3 platform/discord type/security
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
NousResearch/hermes-agent#117848 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100