SAP / SAP/cloud-sdk-java

DefaultHttpDestination.equals() change in 5.34.0 causes MT sidecar 408 timeouts under load

Offen
#1,268 1 Kommentar 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Java
Sterne
41
Forks
33
Ø Merge
18 Std. 34 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
19

Beschreibung

Summary

After upgrading from 5.33.0 to 5.34.0, a Java CAP application that uses the MTX sidecar (@sap/cds-mtxs) for multi-tenancy experiences HTTP 408 Request Timeout responses from the sidecar during tenant subscribe/unsubscribe. The issue is consistently reproducible on a loaded CI environment (Jenkins), though not locally where the sidecar responds fast enough.

Affected versions

  • Broken: 5.34.0
  • Working: 5.33.0

Root cause analysis

PR #1095 ("Fix unexpected connection-pool shut-down") changed DefaultHttpDestination.equals() and hashCode() to now include customHeaderProviders and headerProvidersFromClassLoading in the comparison (previously these were excluded).

DefaultHttpDestination equality is the cache key for the Cloud SDK HTTP client cache (DefaultApacheHttpClient5Cache). MT scenarios attach per-tenant header providers (auth/token headers) to destinations. Before this change, all tenants pointing at the same sidecar URI shared one HttpClient and one connection pool. After this change, each tenant's destination is a distinct cache key → a new HttpClient + connection pool is created per subscribe/unsubscribe call → rapid connection pool churn against a single sidecar process → the sidecar starts returning 408.

The relevant call chain (in com.sap.cds:cds-feature-mt):

ProvisioningService.subscribe()
  → ServiceCallImpl.execute()
  → HttpClientFactory.getHttpClient(destination)     // calls ApacheHttpClient5Accessor
  → sidecar PUT /-/cds/saas-provisioning/tenant/{id}
  ← HTTP 408
  → InternalError("Unexpected return code 408")      // 408 is not in the retry set {500,502,503,504}
  → MtxSidecarDeploymentHandler.onSubscribe() throws
  → HTTP 500 to the subscribe caller

Evidence

Two consecutive CI builds on the same PR branch both failed with the exact same stack:

Caused by: com.sap.cds.feature.mt.lib.subscription.exceptions.InternalError: Unexpected return code 408
  at com.sap.cds.feature.mt.lib.subscription.ProvisioningService.lambda$new$1(ProvisioningService.java:80)
  ...
Caused by: com.sap.cds.feature.mt.lib.subscription.exceptions.InternalError: Unexpected return code 408
  at com.sap.cds.feature.mt.lib.subscription.ProvisioningService.lambda$new$1(ProvisioningService.java:80)

Failing test: com.sap.mtx.multitenancy.SubscribeAndUnsubscribeTest.onBoardAndOffBoardNewTenant (expects HTTP 201, gets 500). All other 13 commits in the 5.33.0→5.34.0 range are dependency bumps that are already overridden by the consuming project's own version pins — the only behaviour-changing commit is #1095.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Run an MTX-sidecar-based CAP Java application's integration tests that subscribe/unsubscribe multiple tenants in rapid succession (e.g. the mtx-local module of cds-services).
  2. Each subscribe/unsubscribe call hits the sidecar via ApacheHttpClient5Accessor.getHttpClient(destination) where the destination carries tenant-specific header providers.
  3. With 5.34.0, a new HttpClient + connection pool is allocated per tenant on every call → pool exhaustion / timeout after several tenants → 408 from the sidecar.
  4. With 5.33.0, all same-URI destinations share one HttpClient and pool → no exhaustion → sidecar responds 200/202.

Suggested fix

Options:

  • On the cloud-sdk side: consider whether the HTTP-client cache should key on something coarser (e.g. URI only, or URI + a stable identity of the header providers) rather than full header provider equality, especially for the per-request-dynamic providers used in MT scenarios.
  • As a workaround: the consuming application can pin cloud.sdk.version=5.33.0 until this is resolved.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit dem Vergleich der Änderungen an DefaultHttpDestination.equals() und hashCode() in PR #1095 mit dem Verhalten von DefaultApacheHttpClient5Cache. Reproduziere den Fehler über com.sap.mtx.multitenancy.SubscribeAndUnsubscribeTest.onBoardAndOffBoardNewTenant und verfolge die an ApacheHttpClient5Accessor.getHttpClient() übergebene Destination. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn das MT-Szenario für subscribe/unsubscribe unter Last keine 408- oder HTTP-500-Antworten mehr erzeugt.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
java
Bereich
backend, networking
Issue-Typ
Bug
Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
48/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.