SAP-samples / SAP-samples/codejam-code-based-agents

JavaScript track: npm install can resolve an incompatible @langchain/core, even though the committed lockfile is fine

未关闭 适合新手
#37 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

主要语言
Python
星标
54
派生
36
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

Summary

package.json (both starter-project and solution) pins:
json "@langchain/core": "1.1.39", "@langchain/langgraph": "1.2.8", ​

The committed package-lock.json resolves @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint (a transitive dependency of @langchain/langgraph) to 1.0.1, which is compatible with @langchain/core@1.1.39. So the lockfile itself is internally consistent.

The problem: the exercises instruct learners to run npm install, not npm ci. npm install can re-resolve transitive dependencies against whatever's currently newest on the npm registry rather than strictly honoring the lockfile. @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint has since published newer versions (currently 1.1.3) that require @langchain/core: ^1.1.48 — incompatible with the exact 1.1.39 pin. A fresh npm install today resolves to this newer, incompatible version.

Effect

Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './utils/uuid' is not defined by "exports" in .../node_modules/@langchain/core/package.json imported from .../@langchain/langgraph/node_modules/@langchain/langgraph-checkpoint/dist/id.js ​
thrown immediately on npx tsx src/basicAgent.ts (or any entry point importing @langchain/langgraph), since @langchain/core@1.1.39 doesn't yet expose the ./utils/uuid export subpath that the newer langgraph-checkpoint@1.1.3 needs.

Suggested fix

Either:

  1. Bump the pinned @langchain/core version in package.json to something satisfying ^1.1.48 (e.g. 1.1.49 or later), removing the fragility of the exact pin against a moving transitive dependency, or
  2. Have learners run npm ci instead of npm install in the exercise instructions, so the exact working dependency tree from the committed lockfile is used rather than a fresh, potentially-drifted resolution (tradeoff: learners then don't get any newer patch versions of pinned packages).

Option 1 is more robust long-term, since this kind of drift will keep recurring as the npm ecosystem publishes new versions over time, regardless of the lockfile.

Environment

Reproduced on a personal SAP AI Core tenant, JavaScript/TypeScript track, npm install run fresh in starter-project/ (not npm ci), Node.js v24.18.0.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 starter-project 和 solution 中的 package.json、已提交的 package-lock.json 以及练习中关于安装依赖的说明开始。先在 starter-project 中执行全新的 npm install 进行复现,然后运行 npx tsx src/basicAgent.ts 以确认失败。两套练习配置都使用兼容的依赖树,并且入口点能够在没有 package export error 的情况下运行,即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
javascript
领域
build-system
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
活跃度
活跃
描述清晰度
描述清楚
新手友好度
76/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。