SAP-samples / SAP-samples/codejam-code-based-agents
JavaScript track: npm install can resolve an incompatible @langchain/core, even though the committed lockfile is fine
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 54
- 派生
- 36
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
Summary
package.json (both starter-project and solution) pins:
json "@langchain/core": "1.1.39", "@langchain/langgraph": "1.2.8",
The committed package-lock.json resolves @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint (a transitive dependency of @langchain/langgraph) to 1.0.1, which is compatible with @langchain/core@1.1.39. So the lockfile itself is internally consistent.
The problem: the exercises instruct learners to run npm install, not npm ci. npm install can re-resolve transitive dependencies against whatever's currently newest on the npm registry rather than strictly honoring the lockfile. @langchain/langgraph-checkpoint has since published newer versions (currently 1.1.3) that require @langchain/core: ^1.1.48 — incompatible with the exact 1.1.39 pin. A fresh npm install today resolves to this newer, incompatible version.
Effect
Error [ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED]: Package subpath './utils/uuid' is not defined by "exports" in .../node_modules/@langchain/core/package.json imported from .../@langchain/langgraph/node_modules/@langchain/langgraph-checkpoint/dist/id.js
thrown immediately on npx tsx src/basicAgent.ts (or any entry point importing @langchain/langgraph), since @langchain/core@1.1.39 doesn't yet expose the ./utils/uuid export subpath that the newer langgraph-checkpoint@1.1.3 needs.
Suggested fix
Either:
- Bump the pinned
@langchain/coreversion inpackage.jsonto something satisfying^1.1.48(e.g.1.1.49or later), removing the fragility of the exact pin against a moving transitive dependency, or - Have learners run
npm ciinstead ofnpm installin the exercise instructions, so the exact working dependency tree from the committed lockfile is used rather than a fresh, potentially-drifted resolution (tradeoff: learners then don't get any newer patch versions of pinned packages).
Option 1 is more robust long-term, since this kind of drift will keep recurring as the npm ecosystem publishes new versions over time, regardless of the lockfile.
Environment
Reproduced on a personal SAP AI Core tenant, JavaScript/TypeScript track, npm install run fresh in starter-project/ (not npm ci), Node.js v24.18.0.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 starter-project 和 solution 中的 package.json、已提交的 package-lock.json 以及练习中关于安装依赖的说明开始。先在 starter-project 中执行全新的 npm install 进行复现,然后运行 npx tsx src/basicAgent.ts 以确认失败。两套练习配置都使用兼容的依赖树,并且入口点能够在没有 package export error 的情况下运行,即视为完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- javascript
- 领域
- build-system
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 2/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-3 小时
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 76/100