DF Reference FAQ for object Service can't be a MultiValue field
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Perl
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 6
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
When you create a new DF for the object "Service" (so I'm not sure if this is in the right repository, as it concerns both) Reference to FAQ-Article, and you mark it as a MultiValue-Field, the field-label is still there, but the field itself is gone.
OTOBO 11.0.5
ServiceCatalog 11.0.2
FAQ 11.0.2
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the missing field using OTOBO 11.0.5, ServiceCatalog 11.0.2, and FAQ 11.0.2 with a Service dynamic field referencing an FAQ article and marked MultiValue. Trace the Service and FAQ dynamic-field handling first; done means the field label and its input are both rendered for this configuration.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- perl
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100