Improve readability/simplicity of fcase() implementation

Open
#6,322 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Refactor
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
r
Domain
data

Research direction

Start by locating the fcase() implementation and the surrounding performance tests, if any. Read the implementation and identify the names or structure that make it hard to follow, then add performance regression coverage before attempting a refactor. Done means the implementation is simpler to understand without introducing performance regressions.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

internals
          Basically LGTM. However, there are many things I would want to rename/remodel for clarity purposes. Right now, I find this piece of our codebase quite hard to grasp in comparison to its complexity.

Originally posted by @ben-schwen in https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/4264#issuecomment-2255663877

A first step IMO is to add several performance regression tests. That way we can refactor with more confidence.

Dominant language
R
Stars
3.9k
Forks
1.1k
Avg merge
14h 4m
Merged PRs (30d)
4

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from Rdatatable/data.table

All issues in Rdatatable/data.table

Similar issues

More R issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.