QuantEcon / QuantEcon/lecture-python-programming
Migrate the production build chain (publish, cache, execution tests) to QuantEcon/mystmd after #363
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 72
- Forks
- 31
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 20 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 8
Beschreibung
Goal
Finish what #363 starts: once the JB2 branch lands, the repo should be 100% QuantEcon/mystmd — no jupyter-book 1.x anywhere in the build chain. #363 deliberately migrates only the PR preview (ci.yml) and ipynb builds (build-ipynb.yml); everything production-facing still runs the JB1/Sphinx toolchain from main, driven by lectures/_config.yml + _toc.yml, which #363 replaces with myst.yml. Mixing the two long-term means every lecture edit is validated against one engine and published with another.
What still runs jupyter-book 1.x
| surface | current | mystmd path |
|---|---|---|
publish.yml HTML deploy |
jb build lectures |
myst build --html — already proven in ci.yml / build-ipynb.yml |
publish.yml PDF |
jb build --builder pdflatex |
typst export — a book-pdf export is already stubbed (commented) in lectures/myst.yml; needs building out and visual review |
publish.yml notebook downloads |
sphinx-tojupyter custom builder | myst build --ipynb — already prototyped in build-ipynb.yml, including the MyST-syntax-leak audit step |
cache.yml weekly execution cache |
jb build |
mirror of ci.yml's build, or retire in favour of ci.yml's cache (whose key is now engine-aware) |
execution-*.yml (linux/osx/win) |
pip install jupyter-book + Sphinx stack |
decide: port to mystmd, or retire — their purpose (execution regression) is partly covered by ci.yml now being a genuine cold-execution test |
environment.yml |
pins jupyter-book>=1.0.4post1,<2.0 |
replace with myst_requirements.txt as the single environment |
linkcheck_ignore in _config.yml |
Sphinx-only config | already duplicated into linkcheck.yml ignore-patterns (#592); retires with the file |
Housekeeping in the same sweep: cache.yml is still named "Build Cache [using jupyter-book]", and .github/workflows/_github_actions/ci.yml is a stale stashed copy of the old preview workflow.
Constraints and lessons to carry over (from the #363 incident, 2026-08-03)
Execution-affecting configuration must be inside the execution cache key — hash the workflow file and requirements alongside the lectures, as ci.yml now does, or an engine/env change ships green against stale outputs. Pin the mystmd fork by SHA and JAX by version. Keep XLA_PYTHON_CLIENT_PREALLOCATE=false (or successor policy from QuantEcon/meta#350) on any step that executes the JAX lectures concurrently on a single-GPU runner; the JB1 chain never needed it only because Sphinx executes sequentially. Keep the memory/dmesg telemetry pattern on GPU execution jobs.
Sequencing
This is follow-up work to #363, not part of it — it should land as its own PR(s) after #363 merges, with the PDF export likely the long pole (needs typst template work and visual signoff). Related: QuantEcon/meta#348 (shared build-lectures action) is the natural place for the standardised pieces to land once, and QuantEcon/meta#350 will supply the JAX-on-CI configuration defaults.
Carried over from #344 (consolidated 2026-08-04)
Two mystmd build warnings remain from the #342/#344 tracking pair (both closed in favour of this issue):
-
python_oop.md:12— index directive parse failure:single: OOP II: Building Classes(the second colon breaks parsing). Fix by rewording the entry, e.g.single: OOP II -- Building Classes. -
status.md:16—unknown directive: nb-exec-table(sphinx-tojupyter only). Needs a mystmd equivalent or a redesign of the execution-status page.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit, #363s ci.yml und build-ipynb.yml mit publish.yml, cache.yml, execution-*.yml, environment.yml und lectures/myst.yml zu vergleichen. Verfolge, wie Produktions-HTML, PDF, Notebook-Downloads, Caching und Ausführungstests derzeit erstellt werden. Abgeschlossen ist die Arbeit, wenn die verbleibenden Produktionsoberflächen nicht mehr jupyter-book 1.x verwenden, der Cache ausführungssbeeinflussende Eingaben enthält, das PDF visuell geprüft wurde und die aufgeführten mystmd-Warnungen behoben sind.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- github-actions, jupyter-notebook, python
- Bereich
- build-system, ci-cd, documentation
- Issue-Typ
- Refactoring
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100