Evaluation UI: UX Inconsistency

Is your feature request related to a problem?

When uploading a new dataset, users provide a CSV with question and answer columns. These become the golden dataset's question and
ground truth.

However, in evaluation results, we display columns: question, answer, and ground_truth — where answer is now the
generated response while question and ground_truth are from the original upload. This naming inconsistency creates confusion from a UX
perspective.

Describe the solution you'd like

• Rename the CSV upload columns to question and ground_truth (instead of question and answer)
• This aligns the upload schema with the evaluation results display
• Consistent naming: question = input, ground_truth = expected answer, answer = generated response

Alternative

Keep upload columns as-is but rename ground_truth column in evaluation results UI to expected_answer to differentiate it more clearly
from answer (generated response).

Inizia tracciando il flusso di caricamento CSV e l’UI dei risultati della valutazione per individuare dove sono definiti i nomi delle colonne. Esamina il pull request collegato e conferma quale scelta di denominazione è stata implementata; il lavoro è completato quando lo schema di caricamento e la visualizzazione dei risultati usano nomi chiari e coerenti per domanda, Ground Truth e risposta generata.