UI/UX NGO Feedbacks: Enhance configurations and workflows

Summary

This issue tracks UI/UX feedback, workflow confusion, and feature improvement suggestions gathered from internal usage, NGO cohort discussions, and partner feedback sessions related to configurations, collections, evaluations, guardrails, and voice/audio workflows.

---

Configuration Creation Flow

• Improve UX for creating a new configuration from the Library page.
• Current flow involving:
  • loading an existing config
  • selecting + New Config from dropdown
    is non-intuitive and confusing.

Config ↔ Text Evaluation Navigation

• Improve navigation/UX between:
  • Configurations → Text Evaluations
  • Text Evaluations → Configurations
• Current screens expose too much information upfront, causing confusion:
  • Dataset / Create Dataset
  • Evaluations / Create Evaluation

---

Untitled Collection Placeholder

• Replace "Untitled Collection" with a better dummy/default naming mechanism.

Pending Collection Visibility

• While creating collections from existing documents:
  • show PENDING status immediately
  • prevent collection cards from disappearing until SUCCEEDED

Better Collection Creation Mechanics

• Improve UX for creating collections from documents.
• Current multiselect dropdown forces users to remember document names.
• Explore better interaction patterns:
  • drag-and-drop
  • searchable selection
  • document cards/list selection

---

Vector Store Visibility

• Move Vector Store ID/tool visibility to the primary view in Prompt Editor.
• Currently hidden behind the + Add Tool action, making discoverability poor.

---

Audio / Conversational AI UX & Features

Conversational Memory Layer

• Explore conversational memory layer for audio-heavy use cases.
• Need user-specific contextual memory persistence across multi-turn conversations.

Audio Cost Visibility

• Add predictable cost/token estimation for audio workflows.
• Current providers make token/credit usage difficult to estimate.

Multi-Provider Audio Evaluation Support

• Add support for multiple STT/TTS providers in evaluations UI:
  • Sarvam
  • ElevenLabs
  • Gemini
  • AI4Bharat
  • Bhashini

Better Provider-Specific Benchmarking

• Improve provider/model/language-specific benchmarking:
  • STT
  • TTS
  • Speech-to-Speech
  • RAG

Die Issue nennt keine Dateien, Tests oder Einstiegspunkte. Beginne damit, das Feedback in separat abgegrenzte Änderungen an Konfiguration, Erfassung, Prompt-Editor und Audio-Workflow aufzuteilen, und ermittle dann die relevanten UI-Einstiegspunkte für einen vereinbarten Scope. Done sollte pro Scope definiert werden, da die Issue derzeit UX-Änderungen, neue Funktionen und Provider-Unterstützung ohne Akzeptanzkriterien kombiniert.