RFC for pluggable logging model

Per #106, this is to track the need for an RFC that would create a pluggable provider model for logging. Quoting me from that thread:

@PowerShell/powershell-committee discussed this one in detail today. We believe that there's massive value in figuring out how to tee logs off to remote logging providers, but a bunch of the semantics in this RFC are specific to Splunk.

Instead, we think an RFC should be authored that builds a provider/plugin model for allowing multiple remote logging providers. This RFC should also give consideration to whether local logging targets should be treated the same way (e.g. if you want to exclusively log to a remote target, maybe in serverless/stateless scenarios). There should also be a consideration of whether we should have something like a Get-PSLog or Write-PSLog that are agnostic to logging providers.

The PowerShell Team has a strong interest in picking this up, but we have no idea when we can get to it right now. We only know that it should be a flexible, pluggable model.

Commencez par lire l’issue #106 et la discussion du PowerShell Committee citée ici afin de comprendre les sémantiques spécifiques à Splunk existantes. Rédigez un RFC définissant un modèle flexible de provider/plugin, incluant des cibles distantes et locales ainsi que des opérations de journalisation indépendantes du provider ; le travail sera considéré comme terminé lorsque le modèle proposé couvrira ces scénarios et sera prêt à recueillir les retours de la communauté.