Should Script Analyzer deal with binary modules?

Here's a thought that just came to mind while discussing pluralized nouns in more Azure cmdlets with another MVP:

If a module author creates a binary module with cmdlets that have pluralized nouns, I think (haven't specifically tested these scenarios myself) they can package that up in a module in one of two lazy ways:

1. Drop the dll into a folder with the same name as the dll (minus the extension), and voila, it's auto-discoverable via PowerShell if it's in the right path.
2. Drop the dll into a folder with the same name as the dll, along with a manifest with the same name so that you get versioning, have the manifest load the binary module, but leave the default '*' values for all Export_whatever_ manifest attributes so that all cmdlets are exported.

In both of these scenarios, there is nothing that PSScriptAnalyzer can do to flag issues like pluralized nouns or non-standard verbs, is there? Does PSScriptAnalyzer even check a manifest for pluralized nouns in the exported command names, if they are listed?

I started thinking about this because I was wondering how/why so many pluralized nouns were getting included in released modules from the AzureRM group, and if they use binary cmdlets, this may be one of the reasons why. I'm looking forward to PSScriptAnalyzer evolving into simply PSAnalyzer or perhaps adopting a PSModuleAnalyzer sibling that can check for these types of issues, either by loading modules as part of the inspection or, preferably, by inspecting with reflection or other means the contents of binary modules for issues with command naming and attribute use.

Aucun fichier, test ou point d’entrée n’est indiqué. Commencez par examiner comment PSScriptAnalyzer gère actuellement les modules et les manifestes, puis déterminez s’il est possible d’inspecter les noms de commandes des modules binaires ; la tâche ne pourra être considérée comme terminée qu’une fois le périmètre de détection des noms au pluriel et des verbes non standard défini.