PowerShell / PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer
rule request: AvoidPlusEqualToPopulateDictionary
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- C#
- 星标
- 2.2k
- 派生
- 414
- 平均合并
- 13 小时 1 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 2
描述
Avoid assignment by addition operator (+=) to populate a dictionary
As with using the assignment by addition operator (+=) to build a collection or a string, populating a dictionary using the assignment by addition operator (+=) is in effective:
Tests
$tests = @{
'Array+=' = {
param($count)
$result = @()
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result += $i
}
}
'IList.Add' = {
param($count)
$result = [Collections.Generic.List[int]]::new()
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result.Add($i)
}
}
'IList+=' = {
param($count)
$result = [Collections.Generic.List[int]]::new()
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result += $i
}
}
'IDictionary[]' = {
param($count)
$result = @{}
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result[$i] = $i
}
}
'IDictionary.Add' = {
param($count)
$result = @{}
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result.Add($i, $i)
}
}
'IDictionary+=' = {
param($count)
$result = @{}
foreach($i in 1..$count) {
$result += @{ $i = $i }
}
}
} # Tests
1kb, 5kb, 10kb | ForEach-Object {
$groupResult = foreach($test in $tests.GetEnumerator()) {
$ms = (Measure-Command { & $test.Value -Count $_ }).TotalMilliseconds
[pscustomobject]@{
CollectionSize = $_
Test = $test.Key
TotalMilliseconds = [Math]::Round($ms, 2)
}
[GC]::Collect()
[GC]::WaitForPendingFinalizers()
}
$groupResult = $groupResult | Sort-Object TotalMilliseconds
$groupResult | Select-Object *, @{
Name = 'RelativeSpeed'
Expression = {
$relativeSpeed = $_.TotalMilliseconds / $groupResult[0].TotalMilliseconds
$speed = [Math]::Round($relativeSpeed, 2).ToString() + 'x'
if ($speed -eq '1x') { $speed } else { $speed + ' slower' }
}
} | Format-Table -AutoSize
}
CollectionSize Test TotalMilliseconds RelativeSpeed
-------------- ---- ----------------- -------------
1024 IDictionary[] 0.19 1x
1024 IList.Add 0.35 1.84x slower
1024 IDictionary.Add 0.50 2.63x slower
1024 Array+= 0.74 3.89x slower
1024 IList+= 1.16 6.11x slower
1024 IDictionary+= 39.17 206.16x slower
CollectionSize Test TotalMilliseconds RelativeSpeed
-------------- ---- ----------------- -------------
5120 IDictionary[] 0.71 1x
5120 IDictionary.Add 1.41 1.99x slower
5120 IList.Add 1.50 2.11x slower
5120 IList+= 20.33 28.63x slower
5120 Array+= 21.51 30.3x slower
5120 IDictionary+= 1880.89 2649.14x slower
CollectionSize Test TotalMilliseconds RelativeSpeed
-------------- ---- ----------------- -------------
10240 IDictionary[] 0.92 1x
10240 IDictionary.Add 3.79 4.12x slower
10240 IList.Add 4.71 5.12x slower
10240 IList+= 71.91 78.16x slower
10240 Array+= 86.93 94.49x slower
10240 IDictionary+= 5502.40 5980.87x slower
Instead use (even for a single item):
- the square bracket syntax (
$Dictionary[$Key] = $Value) or dot syntax ($Dictionary.$Key = $Value) which will overwrite any duplicate key - the
.Add()method ($Dictionary($Key, $Value)) which returns an error when the key already exists
Proposed technical implementation details (optional)
As apposed to the requests for avoiding the assignment by addition operator (+=) to build a collection or a string, the majority of this bad practice syntax would be easier to capture:
- Check for the
+=operator - Directly followed by a hash table syntax
@{ ... }- With a single key-value pair
- And a dynamic key
Even using a simple search string will capture lot of issues (note that almost all results are embedded in a foreach loop):
https://github.com/search?q=language%3Apowershell+%22%2b=%20@%7B%20$%22&type=code
The LHS could still be anything else than a presumed IDictionary, e.g. an IList.
But than there is still a good reason to avoid the += operator...
What is the latest version of PSScriptAnalyzer at the point of writing
1.24.0
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
该 issue 没有指定实现文件或测试。首先定位现有的 += 规则及其测试模式,然后确认规则如何区分 += 后跟一个带动态键的单条目哈希表。完成标准是:新规则报告目标字典填充形式,同时保留文档中说明的方括号、点号和 Add 替代方案。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- csharp, powershell
- 领域
- devtools, tooling
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100