PowerShell / PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer
Improve settings format, allow JSON + custom settings formats
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- C#
- Étoiles
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 414
- Merge moyen
- 13 h 1 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Description
Currently PSScriptAnalyzer settings suffer from the following drawbacks:
- They are opaque and truly documented only by the parsing logic
- Misconfiguration usually fails silently, or at best issues an unhelpful generic error
- They must be specified in PSD format, forcing a PSD parser to be present
- Configurable rules cannot easily specify arbitrary configurations to be read from settings
- Setting properties on configurable rules can conflict with constructors (they are set after constructor and default value evaluation)
- Settings (and
Invoke-ScriptAnalyzerparameters) have ambiguous duplication likeRules,IncludeRulesandExcludeRules - The default
Enablerule configuration isfalse... - Rule names vs namespaces aren't delineated, so it can't be known from settings where the namespace vs name of a rule begins/ends
Instead, PSScriptAnalyzer settings should:
- Be self-documenting when possible
- Issue useful errors about where and why settings parsing failed
- Be specifiable in multiple convenient ways that don't require PowerShell (particularly in JSON), and allow extension to specify them in more ways
- Allow arbitrary structured configuration for rules, to be defined by those rules, and read configurations in as objects for the rule to consume
- Pass configurations to rules in the constructor call, to allow rules to apply the configurations at the correct time and with their own logic
- Make settings simple and self-documenting, with no ambiguous concepts
- Enable rules by default, while offering a way to disable them while preserving their configuration entry
- Specify rules by name and namespace, separating them with a
/character
As such, the proposed new settings will provide:
- An extensible API to provide settings
- A better way to provide settings in PSD format (and the same from a hashtable object)
- A new way to provide settings as JSON
PSSA API structure
PSSA will provide an extensible API to provide configurations. This consists of a top level Script Analyzer configuration:
An individual rule configuration:
And the ability to implement a subclass/implementation of IRuleConfiguration and inject it into a rule's constructor by specifying a rule as generic:
Script Analyzer is able to use this configuration type in the generic parameter to deserialise the rule configuration when it is contructed.
PSD settings
Implementing these APIs for PSD format, a typical PSD settings file will look like this:
@{
BuiltinRules = "Default" # Or "None" | "Aggressive" (name changeable)
RuleExecution = "Default" # Or "Sequential" | "Parallel", possibly others depending on executor implementations
RulePaths = @(
"C:\somewhere\rules.dll"
"path/relative/to/host/configured/root/module.psm1"
"/also/allow/directory/module/"
)
RuleConfiguration = @(
@{ Rule = "PS/AvoidAliases"; Configuration = @{ Enable = $false } }
@{
Rule = "PS/UseCompatibleCommands"
Configuration = @{
TargetPlatforms = @(
@{ OS = "Linux" }
@{ OS = "MacOS" }
)
}
}
@{
Rule = "PS/AnotherRule"
Configuration = @{
ModeEnum = "CustomMode"
Numbers = @(1, 2, 3)
}
}
@{ Rule = "PS/RuleWithoutConfiguration" }
@{ Rule = "ExternalRules/ExternallyImplementedRule" }
)
}
Setting fields that aren't provided will have sensible defaults, and explicit default options allowing for the same. When rule settings are deserialised for the first time, failures will be reported (I haven't gotten to this part yet, but I would like to make the settings tell users where the failure occurred, what was given and what was expected).
Hashtable settings
Settings provided by Hashtable object will follow exactly the same conventions as those given above for PSD format, except converting from an in-memory hashtable object. A PSD file and its hashtable result in PowerShell will convert to the same settings.
JSON settings
Similar to the PSD settings, the JSON settings will essentially offer a new syntax for rule settings:
{
"BuiltinRules": "Default",
"RuleExecution": "Default",
"RulePaths": [
"C:\\somewhere\\rules.dll",
"path/relative/to/host/configured/root/module.psm1",
"/also/allow/directory/module/",
],
"RuleConfiguration": [
{ "Rule": "PS/AvoidAliases", "Configuration": { "Enable": false } },
{
"Rule": "PS/UseCompatibleCommands",
"Configuration": {
"TargetPlatforms": [
{ "OS": "Linux" },
{ "OS": "MacOS" }
]
}
},
{
"Rule": "PS/AnotherRule",
"Configuration": {
"ModeEnum": "CustomMode",
"Numbers": [1, 2, 3]
}
},
{ "Rule": "PS/RuleWithoutConfiguration" },
{ "Rule": "ExternalRules/ExternallyImplementedRule" }
]
}
Deserialisation to objects
Settings in PSD and JSON form will be deserialised to the type requested by the rule they configure. For JSON, this will use Newtonsoft.Json deserialisation, so allowing all attributes it supports. In the case of PSD, those attributes will also be supported. For example:
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Commencez par lire les interfaces liées dans ScriptAnalyzer2/Configuration/IScriptAnalyzerConfiguration.cs et IRuleConfiguration.cs, puis examinez la prise en charge des règles génériques dans ScriptAnalyzer2/Rules/Rule.cs. Consultez Tests/ScriptAnalyzer2.Test/PsdTypedObjectConverterTests.cs pour connaître la couverture de désérialisation existante. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsque les API de configuration PSD, hashtable et JSON proposées prennent en charge des paramètres structurés spécifiques aux règles avec des erreurs d’analyse utiles.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- csharp, powershell
- Domaine
- tooling
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100