PowerShell / PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer
Migrate away from MEF for loading DLLs in Windows PowerShell
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C#
- Estrellas
- 2.2k
- Forks
- 414
- Merge medio
- 13 h 1 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 2
Descripción
PSScriptAnalyzer's .NET Framework builds depend on a lesser known technology called the Managed Extensibility Framework (namespaced to System.ComponentModel.Composition) to do a kind of lazy loading of assemblies for rules, presumably for custom rule sets.
This seems to be a kind of inversion of control framework, although we use it in a less typical way than a web server might:
It also means that for rules to be discoverable they need to be decorated with attributes like here:
https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer/blob/cfeb7d5f510763ba33a9a4ec73259d7d6ea86fdb/Rules/AvoidGlobalFunctions.cs#L18-L20
All of that is fine, and it may be that PSScriptAnalyzer users are having success with it, but I'm not really sure if anyone is using it.
There are two problems:
- We aren't using (and don't seem to need) MEF in PowerShell Core (it apparently has been ported, but it's not clear to what extent).
- MEF loads assemblies differently to PowerShell
This problem raised itself in https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer/pull/1133, where a rule that depended on an external assembly, which in turn depended on a third assembly failed to load only in .NET Framework (and behaved differently across PowerShell versions).
The error looked like this:
System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException: Unable to load one or more of the requested types. Retrieve the LoaderExceptions property for more information.
at System.Reflection.RuntimeModule.GetTypes(RuntimeModule module)
at System.Reflection.Assembly.GetTypes()
at System.ComponentModel.Composition.Hosting.AssemblyCatalog.get_InnerCatalog()
at System.ComponentModel.Composition.Hosting.AssemblyCatalog.GetEnumerator()
at System.Linq.Buffer`1..ctor(IEnumerable`1 source)
at System.Linq.Enumerable.ToArray[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)
at Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.SafeDirectoryCatalog..ctor(String folderLocation, IOutputWriter outputWriter)
System.ComponentModel.Composition.CompositionException: The composition produced a single composition error. The root cause is provided below. Review the CompositionException.Errors property for more detailed information.
1) Could not load file or assembly 'Newtonsoft.Json, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=30ad4fe6b2a6aeed' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
Resulting in: An exception occurred while trying to create an instance of type 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands'.
Resulting in: Cannot activate part 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands'.
Element: Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands --> Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands --> AssemblyCatalog (Assembly="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules, Version=1.17.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null")
Resulting in: Cannot get export 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands (ContractName="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.Generic.IScriptRule")' from part 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands'.
Element: Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands (ContractName="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.Generic.IScriptRule") --> Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.UseCompatibleCommands --> AssemblyCatalog (Assembly="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules, Version=1.17.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null")
Resulting in: Cannot set import 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptRules (ContractName="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.Generic.IScriptRule")' on part 'Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptAnalyzer'.
Element: Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptRules (ContractName="Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.Generic.IScriptRule") --> Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptAnalyzer
at System.ComponentModel.Composition.CompositionResult.ThrowOnErrors(AtomicComposition atomicComposition)
at System.ComponentModel.Composition.Hosting.ComposablePartExportProvider.Compose(CompositionBatch batch)
at Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.ScriptAnalyzer.LoadRules(Dictionary`2 result, CommandInvocationIntrinsics invokeCommand, Boolean loadBuiltInRules)
At some point, the compatibility rule would depend on Microsoft.PowerShell.CrossCompatibility.dll, which in turn depended on Newtonsoft.Json.dll.
The first load would succeed, but the second would fail because it would only look for Newtonsoft.Json.dll in the directory of powershell.exe rather than in the same directory as Microsoft.Windows.PowerShell.ScriptAnalyzer.BuiltinRules.dll.
This was resolved by adding Add-Type $newtonsoftDllPath to ScriptAnalyzer.psm1.
This may not actually be due to MEF, but is worth investigating in any case. The DLL loading differences between Windows PS and PS Core are here:
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza por las rutas de carga de DLL en Engine/ScriptAnalyzer.cs alrededor de las líneas 930-969; después, lee ScriptAnalyzer.psm1 y los metadatos de la regla en Rules/AvoidGlobalFunctions.cs. Compara el comportamiento de Windows PowerShell y PowerShell Core descrito en el issue con el fallo de la pull request 1133; se considera terminado cuando haya un reemplazo documentado y probado o una resolución clara sobre si se debe eliminar MEF.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- csharp, powershell
- Área
- devtools
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100