OpenCloning / OpenCloning/OpenCloning_backend
Better handling of uracils
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 11
- Avg merge
- 14m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
As of now, they will not be included in the match. This is so that they are conserved in the final sequence. With the alternative joining proposed in #69 this could be fixed.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading this issue alongside the alternative joining proposed in #69, since no source file or test is named here. Determine how uracils are currently excluded from matches and define done as handling them without losing them from the final sequence.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend, bioinformatics
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100