NativeScript / NativeScript/nativescript-cli

NPM package rejected by corporate firewall

Abierto
#3,827 3 comentarios 1 reacción 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

feature
Lenguaje dominante
JavaScript
Estrellas
1.1k
Forks
204
Merge medio
1 d 9 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
8

Descripción

Did you verify this is a real problem by searching the NativeScript Forum and the other open issues in this repo?

Yes. It has been reported in:
https://discourse.nativescript.org/t/installing-nativescript-from-behind-a-corporate-proxy/696

Tell us about the problem

Please, ensure your title is less than 63 characters long and starts with a capital
letter.

The organization I work at requires NPM packages to require dependencies only from NPM. NPM, too, advises against git dependencies. See https://blog.npmjs.org/post/145724408060/dealing-with-problematic-dependencies-in-a: "Generally, we discourage using Git dependencies in package.json, and it’s typically only used temporarily while a maintainer waits for an upstream fix to be applied and published."

When I tried to get NativeScript added to the internal repo for use by developers across the enterprise, my request was rejected because of Github dependencies.

Specifically, the approval team said this module has a dependency on https://github.com/telerik/node-bplist-parser/tarball/master, but the local repo cannot proxy to github.

They advised me to ask you if you could update the above-cited dependency to use a package in the npm registry. They warned that this might be complicated because of the fact that the dependency is a git fork of an npm package. They said you would need to publish your fork on npm and then update this module to use that npm package. This, they argued, would make the module more "corporate firewall friendly", which I assume would promote NativeScript's market share. They said proxying to github in the future is a possibility, but it brings added risk with it. And, per NPM as cited above, github dependencies don't seem to be a best practice anyway.

What I don't understand is why my company's team cited only one github dependency, when package.json seems to show several direct ones. If that needs clarification, I can ask them for it.

Which platform(s) does your issue occur on?

Both

Please provide the following version numbers that your issue occurs with:
  • CLI: (run tns --version to fetch it)
    4.2.2
Please tell us how to recreate the issue in as much detail as possible.

That does not seem practical.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Línea de trabajo

Empieza inspeccionando package.json y la dependencia citada en github.com/telerik/node-bplist-parser/tarball/master. Comprueba las otras dependencias directas de GitHub mencionadas en el informe y determina después si el fork afectado está disponible a través de npm; se considera terminado cuando las dependencias relevantes ya no requieren acceso a GitHub para su instalación.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
javascript, node.js
Área
cli
Tipo de issue
Refactorización
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Estancado
Claridad
Bastante claro
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.