Introduce covariance function in the characterization module
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- matlab
- Domain
- computer-vision
Research direction
Start by locating the characterization module and the existing calculations for specific surface area and particle mean diameter. Read the cited covariance-function paper and compare its method with the current direct calculations; done means the module exposes the covariance-based calculations and their results can be compared for suitable electrode volumes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Introduce the covariance function used for calculation of the specific surface area and the particle mean diameter as done in previous work https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/07711.1095ecst.
That's low priority although, and will likely be added when i will transition the characterization module to app designer.
Reason being I do not think calculating surface area from 3D imaging is a good idea due to the fractal behavior of the surface area (although still interesting to compare electrodes imaged at the same voxel size). Anyway, the difference between the direct method and the covariance function has been investigated in the work cited above for NMC electrodes and: "Sp(geometric covariogram) / Sp(direct method x2/3) ranges from 1.028 to 1.094 for the 16 volumes. It corresponds to a relative error (for the direct method) inferior to 9%."
The method is interesting to get particle diameter although, but the issue with this method is that it requires a large field of view to get a smooth two-point correlation function and get the asymptot.
- Dominant language
- MATLAB
- Stars
- 76
- Forks
- 27
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox#38 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox#34 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox#33 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 58/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox#30 · 2 comments ·
All issues in NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 94/100
VH-Lab/NDIcalc-vis-matlab#107 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
gnu-octave/statistics#498 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
HenrikBengtsson/R.matlab#59 · 3 comments ·
-
enhancement question unconfirmed
Difficulty 2/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 83/100