[FEA]: Improve CI coverage of cuFile
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Cython
- Stars
- 3.4k
- Forks
- 329
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 116
Description
Is this a duplicate?
- I confirmed there appear to be no duplicate issues for this request and that I agree to the Code of Conduct
Area
cuda.bindings
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The majority of the tests in test_cufile.py are skipped because:
@pytest.mark.skipif(not isSupportedFilesystem(), reason="cuFile handle_register requires ext4 or xfs filesystem")
Maybe we should try to add a worker to the mix that /is/ on one of these filesystems to get some better coverage there. I don't know what filesystem our existing workers have (maybe btrfs?)
Describe the solution you'd like
Find a worker that meets the requirements of cuFile that we can run on.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with test_cufile.py and the isSupportedFilesystem skip condition, then inspect the repository's CI worker definitions to determine which workers use ext4 or xfs. Done means a suitable worker is identified and the cuFile tests run there instead of being skipped.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- ci-cd, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100