Medical-Event-Data-Standard / Medical-Event-Data-Standard/medical-event-data-standard.github.io
The tutorial should include a "evaluate your model" section
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 4
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
After a model is built, we should also evaluate the model using MEDS Evaluation
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the tutorial source and read the section where the model is built. Review the linked MEDS Evaluation project to determine how evaluation should be introduced. Done means the tutorial contains a clear evaluation section using that tool, with the expected inputs and outputs documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- documentation, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100