Medical-Event-Data-Standard / Medical-Event-Data-Standard/MEDS-DEV

[Proposal] We should codify a schema or standard (or a path forwards as more experiments are developed in this vein) to separate some sentinel experimental properties for visualization (e.g., dataset size).

Open
#39 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Experimental API priority:low Results storage and tracking
Dominant language
Python
Stars
43
Forks
10
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Current proposal: (model_name, model_version, model_hash (?), dataset_name, dataset_version, dataset_hash (?), task_name, MEDS-DEV_version, uploaded_timestamp, result_json_blob)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue proposes a schema or standard for separating experimental properties used in visualization, including model, dataset, task, version, timestamp, and result fields. Start by reviewing the existing MEDS-DEV benchmark conventions and experiments, then determine the path forward for codifying these fields. Done would require an agreed schema or standard, but the issue does not identify files or tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.