MagicStack / MagicStack/uvloop
signal handler sockets error on close leaving loop in 'running' state indefinitely
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Cython
- Estrellas
- 11.9k
- Forks
- 616
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
- uvloop version: 0.19.0 and 0.20.0
- Python version: 3.12
- Platform: linux/aws lambda
- Can you reproduce the bug with
PYTHONASYNCIODEBUGin env?: - Does uvloop behave differently from vanilla asyncio? How?: have observed the same error on asyncio
I have not been able to come up with a reproduction for this as I think it has something to do with how aws lambda freezes and thaws lambdas.
I have an aws lambda using uvloop that handles requests with using loop.run_until_complete. I can't use uvloop.run or aysncio.run since I need client connected to that loop to still be present on the next invocation of the lambda. Occassionally we have observed errors on the lambda with the following stack trace:
[ERROR] OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/my_code.py", line 302, in request_handler
self.loop.run_until_complete(_process_records())
File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1511, in uvloop.loop.Loop.run_until_complete
File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1504, in uvloop.loop.Loop.run_until_complete
File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1377, in uvloop.loop.Loop.run_forever
File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 547, in uvloop.loop.Loop._run
File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 348, in uvloop.loop.Loop._pause_signals
File "/root/.pyenv/versions/3.12.1/lib/python3.12/socket.py", line 504, in close
self._real_close()
File "/root/.pyenv/versions/3.12.1/lib/python3.12/socket.py", line 498, in _real_close
_ss.close(self)
Because this error happens before the loop sets it's self._running field to 0 this means on the next invocation of the lambda the call to loop.run_until_complete errors with a loop is already running error.
I think the bad file descriptor is caused by some feature of the lambda environment or it could just be some kind of random chance since we have a lot of these running and this happens on very small fraction (<0.01%).
I wrote this patch to catch and ignore the Bad file descriptor error, but don't know if that's the right thing to do in the absence of real test case. If anyone has ideas about how I could produce a test case I am happy to try them out.
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza leyendo en uvloop/loop.pyx alrededor de Loop._pause_signals y Loop.run_until_complete; después inspecciona el parche catch-exception-on-pause enlazado. Reproduce la ruta bad-file-descriptor, incluidas llamadas repetidas a run_until_complete, y añade una prueba de regresión; se considera terminado cuando el bucle no permanece marcado como en ejecución después del fallo.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- backend, networking
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100