MagicStack / MagicStack/uvloop

Using vectorized IO (scatter/gather)

未关闭
#404 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

主要语言
Cython
星标
11.9k
派生
616
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

Operations like writelines in the Stream and the Transport APIs provide library authors the opportunity to send collections of buffers that they would like written, sent, etc. in one go. This can be really handy as it takes only one pass (as opposed to multiple passes) through layers of code to prepare buffers before they go out.

Many OSes supply similar C-level operations like writev on POSIX compatible or similar on Windows for operating on file descriptors. Similarly sendmsg on Linux and Unix or WSASend on Windows provide implementations for sockets.

Admittedly am not very familiar with libuv's API (so maybe devs here can comment on this), but it appears there are some APIs in libuv like uv_write can take multiple buffers, which can internally redirect to sendmsg or WSASend. This also appears to be true for files with the uv_fs_write API.

AFAICT (and I could be wrong about this) uvloop's writelines for Streams calls an internal _write function in a loop, which could write one entire buffer (if it is sufficiently large, etc.) or at least queue a write. Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding anything here.

However given libuv's own propensity to use scatter/gather IO under-the-hood, it might be worth holding off on queuing write operations until all of the buffers in writelines are collected and prepped. This would allow one larger send, write, etc. to occur and if it is above the high watermark for any buffer (likely?), no additional buffer prepping would be necessary either.


Side note: A separate interesting question would be doing something similar for reading. Not sure there is an API that could leverage this currently (may be wrong about this though). Maybe through pausing and resuming reading one could get close (though likely still leaves something on the table)?

Note: There may be similar optimizations possible in asyncio ( https://github.com/python/asyncio/pull/339 ) ( https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19062 )

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 uvloop/handles/stream.pyx 中引用的 writelines 和 _write 行附近开始,然后检查链接的 libuv uv_write、uv_fs_write、sendmsg 和 WSASend API。确定收集 writelines 缓冲区是否能够启用一次向量化操作,并定义由此产生的范围和完成标准。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
networking, performance
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
30/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。