Switch to Trusted Publishing for package upload to PyPI in CI

Trusted publishing (with attestations) is currently suggested as good practice to ensure confidence that what users download from PyPI is the same artifact that was generated in GitHub CI, meaning that what I see in GitHub is the same as what is installed - handy for auditing. It also avoids the presence of PyPI tokens as 'secrets' in the CI, which can be exfiltrated by bad actors.

Following the recent litellm supply chain attack this week, I would like to express my support for this^*. The httptools package is one of 16 packages in the top 500 PyPI packages (by downloads) which use the pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish action but have not yet upgraded it to use Trusted Publishing: this is 'low hanging fruit' in terms of making Python a more secure programming environment.

Instead of using the stored secret token, GitHub vouches for the upload, and PyPI checks the uploading CI workflow filename against a pre-declared filename you set ahead of time (in httptools's case the filename is release.yml). It also requires creating an 'environment' for the repo on GitHub (suggested name "pypi") which you also register the package with on PyPI.

^* Post-mortems of the litellm attack:

1. https://futuresearch.ai/blog/litellm-pypi-supply-chain-attack/
2. https://snyk.io/articles/poisoned-security-scanner-backdooring-litellm/

从 .github/workflows/release.yml 开始，检查 publish job，尤其是 Upload to PyPI 步骤。配置 GitHub pypi 环境及其 PyPI 注册，添加所请求的 job 权限和环境，并移除 password 参数以及可选的 PYPI_API_TOKEN。完成的标准是：通过 Trusted Publishing 并使用 attestations 发布 releases，而不是使用存储的 token。