MagicStack / MagicStack/asyncpg
No rows returned by fetch() when for DELETE rewritten to UPDATE using rule
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 8.1k
- Forks
- 468
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
- asyncpg version: 0.29.0
- PostgreSQL version: 16.2 (
postgres:latestDocker image) - Python version: 3.12.3
- Platform: Tested on macOS and Linux
- Do you use pgbouncer?: No
- Did you install asyncpg with pip?: Yes
- Can the issue be reproduced under both asyncio and uvloop?: Yes
Unexpected behaviour: It seems asyncpg doesn't return the rows returned by a DELETE query rewritten to an UPDATE query by a rule. Perhaps because it's optimizing (the query status is DELETE 0, so perhaps it thinks it doesn't need to return any rows) or something like that? I didn't dive in any further to check if that is indeed what is happening.
Reproduction
import asyncio
import asyncpg
async def main():
connection = await asyncpg.connect('postgresql://postgres:password@localhost/test')
async def fetch_print(query, *params):
result = await connection.fetch(query, *params)
i = 0
for row in result:
print(f' - {row}')
i += 1
if i == 0:
print(' (no rows returned)')
print('')
# Create table with rule for deletion
await connection.execute('''
CREATE TABLE items (
id serial PRIMARY KEY,
name text UNIQUE,
deleted boolean DEFAULT false
);
CREATE RULE softdelete AS
ON DELETE
TO items
DO INSTEAD
UPDATE items SET deleted = true WHERE id = OLD.id RETURNING OLD.*
;
INSERT INTO items (name) VALUES
('foo'),
('bar')
;
''')
print('Our table has a rule that updates the "deleted" column instead of deleting the row.\n')
# Show contents
print('We start with 2 rows which are not soft-deleted:')
await fetch_print('SELECT * FROM items')
# Try delete (the unexpected case)
print('Deleting with RETURNING should give us a row (it does in psql), but we do not get any in asyncpg:')
await fetch_print('''
DELETE FROM items WHERE name = $1 RETURNING id
''', 'foo')
# Confirm above query worked
print('But the row is now soft-deleted:')
await fetch_print('SELECT * FROM items')
# Workaround
print('If wrapped in a CTE it does work:')
await fetch_print('''
WITH x AS (
DELETE FROM items WHERE name = $1 RETURNING id
) SELECT * FROM x
''', 'bar')
# Confirm above query worked
print('And it is again properly softdeleted:')
await fetch_print('SELECT * FROM items')
print('We now delete the rule.\n')
await connection.execute('DROP RULE softdelete ON items')
# Confirm normal delete without rule returns rows
print('Normal deletion (without the rule) does return rows correctly:')
await fetch_print('''
DELETE FROM items RETURNING id
''')
# Confirm above query worked
print('And now both rows are indeed gone:')
await fetch_print('SELECT * FROM items')
# Clean up table after we are done
await connection.execute('DROP TABLE items')
await connection.close()
asyncio.run(main())
Output of reproduction
Our table has a rule that updates the "deleted" column instead of deleting the row.
We start with 2 rows which are not soft-deleted:
- <Record id=1 name='foo' deleted=False>
- <Record id=2 name='bar' deleted=False>
Deleting with RETURNING should give us a row (it does in psql), but we do not get any in asyncpg:
(no rows returned)
But the row is now soft-deleted:
- <Record id=2 name='bar' deleted=False>
- <Record id=1 name='foo' deleted=True>
If wrapped in a CTE it does work:
- <Record id=2>
And it is again properly softdeleted:
- <Record id=1 name='foo' deleted=True>
- <Record id=2 name='bar' deleted=True>
We now delete the rule.
Normal deletion (without the rule) does return rows correctly:
- <Record id=1>
- <Record id=2>
And now both rows are indeed gone:
(no rows returned)
In contrast the psql command line tool does show me the resulting rows when the result code is DELETED 0.
Output of psql
test=# DELETE FROM items WHERE name = 'foo' RETURNING id;
id
----
1
(1 row)
DELETE 0
So it is a bit unexpected that asyncpg doesn't return any rows.
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza ejecutando la reproducción en Python del issue contra PostgreSQL 16.2 y comparando el DELETE con RETURNING reescrito por una regla, la solución alternativa con CTE y un DELETE normal. Rastrea el resultado de fetch de asyncpg para la consulta reescrita directamente; se considera terminado cuando devuelve la fila mostrada por psql y conserva el comportamiento existente para los demás casos.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- postgresql, python
- Área
- databases
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 38/100