MagicStack / MagicStack/asyncpg
Support for disabling transactions
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 8.1k
- 派生
- 468
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
* **asyncpg version**: 0.28.0
* **PostgreSQL version**: CrateDB 5.4.2 https://github.com/crate/crate
* **Do you use a PostgreSQL SaaS? If so, which? Can you reproduce
the issue with a local PostgreSQL install?**: Using CrateDB locally
* **Python version**: 3.11.4
* **Platform**: Linux arm64
* **Do you use pgbouncer?**: No
* **Did you install asyncpg with pip?**: Yes
* **If you built asyncpg locally, which version of Cython did you use?**: 0.29.36
* **Can the issue be reproduced under both asyncio and
[uvloop](https://github.com/magicstack/uvloop)?**: Yes
It would be really useful to be able to disable transaction support for Postgres-like database systems that don't support transactions.
CrateDB is an OLAP database with Postgres Wire Protocol support, however it does not have support for transactions. (`BEGIN` is a no-op, but `ROLLBACK` is an undefined term and causes issues)
Currently using asyncpg like this:
```
asyncpg_pool = await asyncpg.create_pool(**CRATE_DB_CONFIG, loop=loop, max_size=10)
async with asyncpg_pool.acquire() as connection:
await connection.execute("""insert into some_table (event_time, field1, field2) values ($1, $2, $3);""", datetime.now(), user_id, session_id)
```
I'm deliberately avoiding any `connection.transaction()` calls yet asyncpg still appears to wrap everything in a transaction block.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先跟踪 issue 中所示的 create_pool 和 pool.acquire 用法,然后将其与 connection.transaction 的行为进行比较。在本地 CrateDB 实例上复现该工作负载,并确定隐式事务命令的发出位置。完成的标准是存在一种受支持的方式来禁用该行为,使所示的 insert 不会在 CrateDB 上失败。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- postgresql, python
- 领域
- databases
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100