MagicStack / MagicStack/asyncpg

When using Redshift - PostgresSyntaxError: syntax error at or near "ORDER" - in query with no "ORDER"

Ouverte
#1,009 10 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
8.1k
Forks
468
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Description

* **asyncpg version**: asyncpg==0.27.0.
* **PostgreSQL version**: PostgreSQL 8.0.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3), Redshift 1.0.46987.
* **Do you use a PostgreSQL SaaS? If so, which? Can you reproduce
the issue with a local PostgreSQL install?**: I am using Amazon Redshift. I could not reproduce the issue with `potgres:9.0` Docker image.
* **Python version**: Python 3.9.12.
* **Platform**: Windows 10 Pro, 22H2, 19045.2604.
* **Do you use pgbouncer?**: No.
* **Did you install asyncpg with pip?**: Yes.
* **If you built asyncpg locally, which version of Cython did you use?**: -
* **Can the issue be reproduced under both asyncio and
[uvloop](https://github.com/magicstack/uvloop)?**: Have not tried `uvloop`.

Running this snippet:

```python
options = ConnectionOptions()

sslctx = ssl.create_default_context(ssl.Purpose.SERVER_AUTH)
sslctx.check_hostname = False
sslctx.verify_mode = ssl.CERT_NONE

connection = await asyncpg.connect(options.dsn, ssl=sslctx)

try:
query = "select 'all' = any($1::text[])"
await connection.fetch(query, ["all"])

finally:
await connection.close()
```

I get this exception:

```python
asyncpg.exceptions.PostgresSyntaxError: syntax error at or near "ORDER"
```

I am wondering, where the "syntax error at or near "ORDER" comes from, as there is no "ORDER" in the original query.

If `asyncpg` does not rewrite queries in any way, and the query passed to `fetch` is forwarded to the database without modification (https://github.com/MagicStack/asyncpg/issues/434#issuecomment-910474719, https://github.com/MagicStack/asyncpg/discussions/859#discussioncomment-1742492) - where does the "ORDER" come from?

Can this issue be worked around, or I should abandon `asyncpg` as a Redshift client? I do understand that Redshift is not officially supported, but this client is very good otherwise.

I was not able to reproduce the error with the `postgres:9.0` instance (the oldest I was able to find quickly). The same (except `ssl=False`) snippet works without errors.

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Piste de recherche

Start with the connection.fetch entry point and the reproduced query `select 'all' = any($1::text[])`, then compare its behavior on Redshift with the reported PostgreSQL Docker image. Determine whether the syntax error originates in asyncpg or Redshift, and document a confirmed workaround or the compatibility limitation.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
postgresql, python
Domaine
databases
Type d'issue
Bug
Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Activité
À l'abandon
Clarté
À clarifier
Accessibilité débutants
25/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.