MISP/misp-rfc

View on GitHub

Specifications used in the MISP project including MISP core format

Stars: 55
Forks: 16
Open beginner issues: 0
Indexed issues: 11

Dominant language: HTML
License: No license data
Last GitHub push: Aug 6, 2026
Latest indexed: Sep 19, 2026
Contributing guide: No contributing guide
Code of conduct: No code of conduct
Beginner labels: No beginner labels indexed
PR merge metrics: No merged PRs in 30d

Beginner friendly Everything

Open All

11 open issues indexed

Feedback on Threat Actor Naming Standard Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100

MISP/misp-rfc#54 · 1 comment · Opened Jan 4, 2025
Feedback on the Threat Actor Naming Standard Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#53 · 2 comments · 2 reactions · Opened Jan 2, 2025
Add a description in the core format about hashes.csv for the manifest part Open

enhancement

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#38 · Opened Nov 17, 2020
update misp-core-format info and raw.md.txt to available draft 08 Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 55/100

MISP/misp-rfc#33 · Opened Dec 19, 2019
Add a section about current implementation (following BP from RFC 7942) Open

enhancement

Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#26 · Opened Jun 23, 2019
`type` codes appear to be duplicated for Attribute and ShadowAttribute; should probably refer to a single appendix table Open

enhancement

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#25 · 1 comment · Opened May 16, 2019
Several of the attribute attributes refer to their context as "event", maybe C&P error? Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#24 · 3 comments · Opened May 16, 2019
warning-list format Internet-Draft Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100

MISP/misp-rfc#7 · Opened Dec 7, 2017
Sample UUID and example orgs should be added Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 25/100

MISP/misp-rfc#5 · 1 comment · Opened Apr 7, 2017
Timestamps should all be in the same format Open

valid

Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#4 · 2 comments · Opened Feb 13, 2017
Fields containing only numbers should be JSON integers Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100

MISP/misp-rfc#3 · 2 comments · Opened Feb 13, 2017

MISP/misp-rfc

Get new issues in your inbox